Fashion Law in Africa
- Hamza Olalekan Dosunmu
- Mar 2
- 10 min read
A book by Bernice Ofunre Asein
An Overview
Fashion Law in Africa by Bernice Ofunre Asein is a foundational text addressing a core imbalance: Africa’s fashion sector is expanding creatively and commercially, yet its legal architecture remains fragmented and externally influenced.
As founder of the continent’s first Fashion Law Institute, Asein proposes a formal recognition of fashion law as both an academic discipline and a professional legal field within African jurisdictions. The book functions simultaneously as a legal textbook, a policy blueprint, and a sectoral intervention.

IN ASEIN'S OWN WORDS: On Inspiration & Motivation
"The inspiration came from a gap I could not unsee and I say that as someone who lived on both sides of it. Before I was called to the bar, I was a fashion designer and entrepreneur. I spent my earlier years fully immersed in the industry running a made-to-order label and also working with thrifted and secondhand cloth, building something from nothing the way so many African designers do. I experienced firsthand what it meant to create in Africa's fashion ecosystem the commercial possibility, the cultural richness, the economic potential that the rest of the world was only beginning to notice. But I also saw the gap. I watched talented designers lose their work, their identity, and their livelihoods to infringement and exploitation not because the law could not protect them, but because no one had translated that law into a language the industry could access. When I was called to the bar, I carried those experiences with me. I understood the designer's vulnerability not as an observer but as someone who had lived it. I realised that Africa's fashion ecosystem was growing faster than its legal infrastructure, and that someone who sat at the intersection of both worlds had a responsibility to bridge that gap. This book was my answer to that responsibility."
Reframing Fashion Law Through an Afrocentric Lens
The book is a structural reorientation away from imported Eurocentric templates toward an Afrocentric legal principle grounded in African realities.
Asein argues that fashion law in Africa must reflect:
1. Legal Pluralism
Thousands of ethnic communities operate under customary systems that coexist with statutory law. Any credible legal framework must acknowledge this plurality.
2. Communal Rights
Many African designs, motifs, and textile traditions are community-held rather than individually authored. Conventional IP regimes often exclude such collective ownership structures.
3. Sovereignty Over Raw Materials
Cotton, leather, raffia, indigo, and natural dyes are frequently extracted without equitable local value retention. The book calls for legal mechanisms that secure benefit sharing.
4. Inclusion of the Informal Economy
Tailors, weavers, dyers, and artisans in general operate outside formal corporate structures yet form the backbone of the industry. Law must be flexible enough to protect them.
The industry itself is defined expansively: textiles, garment production, high fashion, leatherworks, accessories, and the broader value chain are all included within the legal scope.

"The gap this book addresses is fundamental and I want to be direct about it. As far as existing scholarship shows, this is the first legal text that focuses specifically on fashion law in Africa. That fact alone tells you everything about the gap. For too long the African fashion industry has operated in a legal vacuum. Designers create without registering their IP. Contracts are informal or nonexistent. Traditional textile makers have no framework to assert cultural ownership. But beyond those practical gaps there was an even deeper problem, the industry itself did not fully understand that fashion is simultaneously a creative, cultural, and commercial enterprise, and that the law exists to protect and grow all three dimensions. This book speaks to four audiences who needed to find each other. For the fashion industry as a whole it says: you are a serious economic and cultural force and it is time to operate with the legal sophistication that reflects that status. For designers and entrepreneurs specifically it says: the law is not your enemy, it is the foundation of your growth. For lawyers in practice it says: fashion law is a real and serious discipline, not a niche curiosity. For governments and policymakers it says: fashion is not just culture, it is an economic sector that requires deliberate legal infrastructure, trade policy, and regulatory frameworks to compete globally." — Bernice Ofunre Asein
The Structural Realities of Trade and Sustainability
Waste Colonialism and Secondhand Clothing
Asein provides a legal analysis of the secondhand clothing trade—obroni wawu / mivumba—describing it as “waste colonialism.”
Global North nations export unwearable textile waste into African markets, externalising environmental burdens while undermining domestic production.
When East African nations attempted to restrict these imports, they faced pressure under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), illustrating how international trade agreements can limit domestic industrial policy.
Trade Asymmetry and the “Yarn Forward” Rule
Under AGOA, apparel must often meet strict origin requirements to qualify for duty-free access. Many African brands rely on imported fabrics and therefore fail to meet these thresholds, excluding them from trade preferences.
With over 50 legal systems across the continent—Common Law, Civil Law, and Customary Law—cross-border expansion becomes legally complex. Informal agreements and weak contract enforcement expose designers to replication and loss of rights.

On Trade Policy & Industrial Protection
"The AGOA question has never been more urgent than it is right now. The programme just received a short-term extension lasting only until the end of 2026 which tells African countries everything they need to know about the danger of building an industrial strategy on preferential access that can disappear at any moment. Countries like Rwanda and Kenya face a genuine dilemma. AGOA gives them preferential access to the US market but creates structural disincentives to build domestic textile supply chains. The legal pathway forward has to operate on two tracks simultaneously. The first track is reducing dependence on AGOA altogether by using AfCFTA to build intra-African textile trade. If African countries are trading fabric and garments with each other at scale, AGOA becomes an opportunity rather than a lifeline. The second track is using the current extension period strategically to negotiate carve-outs for cultural and heritage textiles because no trade agreement should penalise a country for protecting what is distinctively and irreplaceably theirs. The deeper lesson is this: trade law must serve industrial policy, not undermine it." — Bernice Ofunre Asein
Strategic Protection of Culture
Geographical Indications (GIs) as Cultural Defense
Traditional IP mechanisms—trademarks and copyrights—are often insufficient because they prioritize individual authorship and time-bound protection.
Asein proposes Geographical Indications (GIs) as a more appropriate tool. Unlike trademarks, GIs belong to entire communities.
Textiles such as:
Kente (Ghana)
Àdìrẹ (Nigeria)
are presented as prime candidates for GI protection to prevent foreign mass production—particularly from Asia—from undercutting authentic artisans.
Community Protocols
Beyond formal IP systems, Asein introduces Community Protocols as soft-law instruments allowing indigenous groups to define the terms under which external designers may engage with their heritage.
Intra-African Cultural Appropriation
The book also addresses internal dynamics: dominant cultural groups or urban elites commercializing the heritage of marginalized communities without consent. Ethical responsibility must apply within Africa as much as beyond it.
On Communal IP & Global Frameworks
"This is one of the most urgent tensions in African creative law and it is a tension that existing international frameworks were simply not designed to resolve. TRIPS is built on individual authorship. One creator. One work. One owner. That is a Western legal concept that fundamentally misunderstands how African creative traditions work. Knowledge of how to weave Kente or dye Àdìrẹ is not the product of a single creative moment, it is communal, intergenerational, and living. It belongs to a people, not a person. The harmonisation I advocate for operates on three levels. First, recognising community as a legal entity capable of holding IP rights not as a workaround but as a legitimate and enforceable form of ownership under national law. Second, creating sui generis protections at the national level that sit alongside TRIPS obligations rather than conflicting with them. Third, pushing for meaningful reform within WIPO's Intergovernmental Committee on Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore — a body that has been negotiating for over two decades with insufficient urgency. Africa must show up to that table with unified positions and concrete proposals, not just grievances." — Bernice Ofunre Asein
On Cultural Protection Mechanisms
"Geographical Indications are useful but insufficient. A GI protects origin, it does not protect cultural integrity. A factory anywhere can produce Kente-style fabric at industrial scale without legal consequence, as long as they do not claim it is from Ghana. That loophole is costing African creatives enormously. We are already seeing the consequences. Chinese manufacturers are producing fake Aso-oke and Adire at scale and selling them across the African continent at prices so low that local artisans simply cannot compete. What Africa needs is a layered framework. GIs for origin. Traditional knowledge registers for cultural documentation. And a new continental instrument under the African Union that creates enforceable cultural IP rights, what I call a Cultural Authorship Framework. Critically, this must be backed by trade laws and import policies that actively protect local producers, not just their designs. WIPO has been discussing traditional knowledge protections for over two decades. Africa cannot keep waiting." — Bernice Ofunre Asein

Technology and Emerging Legal Grey Areas
The Iceberg Model of Fashion Technology
Asein uses the “Iceberg Model” to illustrate the layered complexity of fashion technology.
Visible Layer
E-commerce platforms raise issues of consumer protection, digital contracts, data privacy, and cybersecurity.
Submerged Layers
AI-powered design, 3D creatives, robotics in manufacturing, and blockchain supply chain verification introduce new legal questions.
Foundation Layer
Wearable and biometric textiles collect health and personal data. Who owns that data? Who bears liability for breaches? Can proprietary fabric technologies be patented?
The model underscores that the most complex legal issues lie beneath what is publicly visible.
The text also references emerging digital spaces such as the Metaverse in events like Lagos Fashion Week, raising questions about authorship, ownership, and jurisdiction.
On AI & Authorship
"Current copyright doctrine requires human authorship, which means that strictly speaking, a design generated entirely by AI belongs to no one under most legal systems in the world today including across Africa. But that legal vacuum will not stay empty for long. If African jurisdictions do not act quickly to define who owns AI-generated creative work, the answer will be decided for them by default, by precedent, and almost certainly in favour of whoever owns the AI tool. In most cases that will be a foreign technology company, not an African creator. My position is that human creative intent must remain the anchor for authorship. The person who conceived the brief, directed the aesthetic, and made the creative decisions that shaped the output — that person should be recognised as the author, even where AI executed the design. The tool does not create. The vision does. African legal systems need to codify this now before the case law is written elsewhere and imported here as settled doctrine." — Bernice Ofunre Asein

Labour, Modeling, and Invisible Workforces
A significant portion of the book examines labour vulnerabilities in the fashion ecosystem.
Misclassification of Models
Most African models are treated as independent contractors, excluding them from pensions, health insurance, and formal dispute resolution systems.
Child Model Protection
There is a lack of age-specific labour protections, exposing underage talent to exploitation and educational disruption. Asein highlights instances of recruitment from refugee camps under false pretences.
Gig Economy and Invisible Labour
Freelancers, virtual stylists, influencers, and digital creatives often operate without job security and with limited bargaining power against platform algorithms.
The Entrepreneur’s Toolkit
Part II of the book functions as a practical legal guide for fashion entrepreneurs.
It covers:
Business structures: sole proprietorships, partnerships, LLCs
Trademark and copyright registration
Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions (TCEs)
Drafting enforceable contracts
Tax compliance
Ethical sustainability practices
This section bridges theory and operational practice.
The Quintessential Fashion Lawyer
Asein outlines the competencies required for legal professionals in this field:
IP law
Trade law
Labour regulation
Digital governance
Cross-border dispute resolution
Fashion law is presented as an interdisciplinary specialty demanding sector-specific expertise.

Decolonising Fashion Education and Policy Reform
The book calls for reform in academic institutions.
Indigenous textile traditions raffia weaving, indigo dyeing, leather craftsmanship should be integrated into formal curricula not as folklore, but as commercially and legally relevant knowledge systems.
Fashion law should be positioned as a core commercial discipline within African law faculties.
At the policy level, Asein links reform to continental instruments such as the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), advocating harmonised IP frameworks and coordinated trade policy.
On Academic & Institutional Reform
"Let us be honest about where we are starting from. In most cases fashion law does not exist at all in African law faculties. So before we talk about repositioning, we need to talk about introduction. The first task is convincing law faculties that fashion law is even a legitimate discipline. And that conversation begins with dismantling a very common misconception that fashion law is simply intellectual property law with a creative twist. It is not. Fashion is simultaneously a creative, cultural, and commercial enterprise. Which means fashion law touches contract law, trade law, consumer protection, cultural heritage, employment law, competition law, and yes, IP, all at once. It is not a niche. It is a lens through which students can engage with almost every major area of commercial law simultaneously. That is the argument we need to take to law school faculties. Not — please add fashion law as a course. But rather, fashion law is a sophisticated commercial discipline that will make your students better lawyers, more commercially aware, and more relevant to one of Africa's fastest growing industries. The door into African law faculties is not through electives. It is through demonstrating that fashion law belongs at the heart of commercial legal education." — Bernice Ofunre Asein
Conclusion
Fashion Law in Africa operates at multiple levels: doctrinal, practical, policy-oriented, and ethical.
It situates fashion as an economic system embedded within trade law, labour regulation, cultural sovereignty, and digital governance.
The book does not merely document challenges; it proposes a structured legal architecture capable of supporting Africa’s creative sector as it evolves across local, continental, and global arenas.
Personal Legacy & Responsibility
"I think about the young designer in Ghana who does not know her sketch is protectable the moment she creates it. I think about the Adire artisan in Abeokuta whose grandmother taught her a technique that is now being mass produced in a factory she will never visit, sold at a price she can never match. I think about the law student who has never been told that the industry she grew up loving is also a serious legal discipline worthy of her entire career. Those are the people this book is for. I wrote it because I have sat on both sides of this gap as a designer who did not know her rights, and as a lawyer who could see exactly what that ignorance was costing people. The book is the bridge I wished had existed when I needed it. I hope it reaches a designer before she signs a bad contract. I hope it reaches a policymaker before he dismisses fashion as cultural decoration rather than economic infrastructure. I hope it reaches a law student and shows her that this is a real field, with real stakes, and that Africa needs her in it." — Bernice Ofunre Asein




Comments